The fate of the poor shepherd, who, blinded and lost in the snow-storm, perishes in a drift within a few feet of his cottage door, is an emblem of the state of man. On the brink of the waters of life and truth, we are miserably dying.”  from "The Poet", by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

When you need to learn how to learn the Law firsthand from its source, contact Team Law; we can help you.

What will it take to save our: nation, lives, liberty and property?
“First, we must believe — it is possible!”
We will do it when we learn and apply the law.

When Rabbi Ephraim Shore was diagnosed with a very painful deadly cancer, his perspective regarding how he used the time he had left changed.  Respectively, he recalled another Rabbi asking people if they’d be willing to give up one of their kids for $100 million dollars.

Now, be honest and ask yourself: “Would you trade your child for $100 Million?”

Consider the promises, disadvantages and costs of raising children vs. the advantages of having $100 Million.  One reader shared his experience with posing that question to his friends — he found no takers of the offer and quoted one of them as saying: “I would sell a leg or an arm or have a lobotomy. I would do anything to keep them free. I would be a slave on a ship. I would be thrown in prison. I would pray all day. I'd do anything, rather than have my kids taken away. I would be beaten to a pulp. I would take drugs. I would take cyanide. Nothing would take them from my side. My kids were given to me. It's been my honor since birth.

It is resolved that because we are not willing to sell our children for $100 million, we must value them more highly.  Is that why:

We work all day while our children are at school.
We work at night while our children play at home — next to us or in the next room — but without us.
We travel to “must-attend” meetings while our children perform in recitals without us.
We take dinner meetings etc. while our children eat without us at home.
We spend time on phones and other electronic devices when our children want us to be with them.
We watch meaningless games on TV instead of playing games with our children.
We get frustrated with our children when we should be enjoying them.
We yell at them when someone should yell at us for being so selfish.
All the while, we secretly look forward to a day when our children are in college, out of the house and off our payroll.

Is that how we show our children they are each worth more than $100 million to us?

Compare the time, care, thought and priorities you would expend if you suddenly had $100 million wired into a bank account; would you ask questions like:

What do I need to do to protect it?
What should I do to make sure it grows well into the future? 
How can it help me live a happier, more enjoyable life?

So why is it that we don’t ask the same questions about, or spend the same amount of time thinking about, our children, who we all value more than riches?  Why don’t we spend more time working on how we can be better parents?  And, just as importantly, how we can enjoy our kids more and be happier?

Rabbi Shore later learned he had been misdiagnosed—he did not have cancer—instead, he had a treatable condition from which he would recover.  Nonetheless, his experience awakened in him a vision of the blessed opportunity he had to revise his life’s priorities.

On, May 2, 2013, Team Law’s Trustee his wife and four or their children were in their 15 passenger van when it hit a large boulder on the highway.  Our Trustee’s back was broken in several places; thankfully, no one else was injured.  They all felt quite blessed to have survived.  Our Trustee will also recover completely.

Have you ever noticed how such events come upon us in an instant; and, instantly change our lives?  Life threatening experiences often have that perspective changing effect.

My wife and children are more valuable to me than any amount of money; they are my life.
How do you feel about your children?

What would you do if you discovered that someone was systematically lulling you into a false sense of security while they took your children away?

Would you want to know it was happening?
Would you be willing to learn the truth?
After learning the truth, would you want to learn how to save them?
Would you do whatever you needed to do to save them?
Would you be willing to support others as they also worked to not only free their children but help insure that such a thing would never happen again?

Consider the following points of law and their effects:

  1. As a matter of law: a Trust is created anytime anyone, for a lawful purpose, gives something to someone else to hold (see: Contracts, Trusts and the Corporation Sole).
  2. Even when trusts are created without a written contract, trusts are contractually defined business entities that (within the terms of their creation) can do anything any other person can do; respectfully, they act distinctively separate from the parties that control them.
  3. As a matter of law: the United States government (hereinafter: “Corp. U.S.”) reserves ownership of the Social Security Card (hereinafter: “SSC”) along with the registered name and number printed on such cards before they offer the same to their intended cardholders.
  4. Respectively, compare Corp. U.S’. offer to paragraph 1. above and ask yourself, “Does not the acceptance of such an offer constitute a Trust?”  As a matter of Law: it does.
  5. In fact, the Social Security Administration (hereinafter: “SSA”) itself claims, in their own publications, that they created the unique name and number combination to uniquely distinguish the SSA’s cardholding trust (hereinafter: “SSCT”) from any other people of the same or a similar name.

From that did you understand that as a matter of law: the SSC is not “your card”?
        It belongs to Corp. U.S.!  (See: Corp. U.S. Myth 9.)
Respectively, do you understand that the Social Security Number (hereinafter: “SSN”) printed on the SSC is not “your SSN”?
        As a matter of law, it too belongs to Corp. U.S.!

So, ask yourself: “In life and law, if someone asks you: “What’s your SSN?”, what does it mean when you respond by reciting a SSN?”

    There are only two accurate answers to that question:
    1. Because the SSN does not belong to you but instead uniquely distinguishes the SSCT from you and because you lend that SSCT consciousness and physical capacity, responding to such a question with a SSN could simply be the SSCT using the SSN to uniquely distinguish its actions from yours; or,
    2. If you respond to such a question with a SSN as if it were actually “your number”, that would indicate that you have formed a General Partnership with that SSCT; which partnership makes you equally, collectively and severally liable for the obligations of that SSCT; as if you were it.

At this point, it is important for you to know a little bit more about trust law (see: Contracts, Trusts and the Corporation Sole); so, please consider the following:

  1. Any time either a trust’s Creator or its Beneficiary lawfully retains control over either distributions from a trust to its Beneficiary or the ability to terminate the trust, the trust is an agency of that party so retaining that control.
      Respectively, from the onset, Corp. U.S. retains both the power to terminate the SSCT at any time and the power to adjust FICA (the statute that provides for social security deductions from pay), etc. at any time.  Thus, as a matter of law: all Social Security cardholders are agencies of Corp. U.S.
  2. The thing or things (assets) held in trust are called the trust’s ‘res’; and, though title to the res can lawfully be held in the name of the trust, the equity title (i.e., actual ownership) remains with the trust’s Beneficiary.
      When Corp. U.S. first sends a SSC to an intended cardholder they reserve ownership of the SSC to Corp. U.S.; thus, though the card is the trust’s original res, held for the Beneficiary: Corp. U.S., it remains the property of Corp. U.S.
  3. Respectively, all property ever acquired by a trust remains the property of the trust’s Beneficiary.
      Respectively, all property acquired through the use of the SSCT’s name and/or SSN is so acquired by the trust as part of its res; and, the same remains the actual property of Corp. U.S.

Respectively, even though no law requires participation in the Social Security system, people today believe participation is mandatory and applications (Form SS5) for such relationships are filed by hospitals, doctors, guardians, etc. (see: Corp. U.S. Myth 8).  Thus, by the time children are born, their parents/guardians are already allegedly “holding a SSC for the child when the child comes of age”.  Respectively, from infancy, children are taught that the SSN on that so held SSC is their "Social".

Can you not see that by doing that, people voluntarily make their children agents of Corp. U.S.; that is to say, by so making children agents of the State the actual birth parents voluntarily reduce their capacity to “Guardian for the State” acknowledging that the State is the Parent (see: WARN newsletter Vol. 1, Iss. 1: Family Ties).

Respectfully, our history to date clearly shows the people of the United States of America have been systematically lulled into a false sense of (social) security while they voluntarily give their children (as agents) to Corp. U.S.  And, because this process has been going on, with only minute changes, since before 1933, it has been established as such a second natured relationship that the parents don’t even recognize that, by now, they too only act in just such a Corp. U.S. agency capacity.

Given that the SSCT is uniquely distinguished from you (and/or others) by the use of its SSN, consider the following:

  1. Who made the agreement upon which your last job or investment was made, you or the SSCT?
      Answer: If the SSN was used in relation to the agreement, it was the SSCT.
  2. Respective to that last question, who got paid for the returns from that agreement, you or the SSCT?
      Answer: If the SSN was used, it was the SSCT.
  3. Who opened the bank account into which the pay from such agreements was deposited, you or the SSCT?
      Answer: If the SSN was used to open the account, it was the SSCT.
  4. When you used a check, a debit card or a credit card related to that bank account to make a purchase, who made that purchase, you or the SSCT?
      Answer: Because the account was the SSCT’s account, it was the SSCT that made the purchase.
  5. Who got the bank loan that was used to buy your house/car/etc., you or the SSCT?
      Answer: If the SSN was used to secure the loan, it was the SSCT.
  6. When was the last time you purchased anything without in some way using the SSCT?
      Answer: Today, it is common for people to have lived their entire lives without ever making a purchase that was not made by their respective SSCT.

That means that virtually all of the, so called, private property in the United States of America today was purchased by some Corp. U.S. agency (a SSCT or other related entity); and, as such, virtually all such property is currently held in trust for its actual equity titled property owner—Corp. U.S.

Now, if you did not understand the magnitude of the above presented history, facts, laws and their effects, let’s make that clear—it means that not only is virtually all of the private property in the United States of America owned by Corp. U.S. but all such agencies (SSCTs, etc.) and the property that they so hold are controlled by the terms and conditions of their respective agency agreements and not by the Constitution or laws of the United States of America.

Is it any wonder that we, almost daily, witness evidence that the “government” is not being controlled by our constitutions?  Instead, we see what appears to be the unconstitutional expansion of authoritarian power executed through new acts like the PATRIOT Act, the Homeland Security Act and the so called: “ObamaCare” act; and, we see leaders like Corp. U.S’. President taking extraconstitutional actions both in the United States and around the world; which cause the people to cry out impeachment.  Of course, that reminds people that even the Constitution’s provision that, ‘only natural born citizens can serve as President’ is no longer being enforced by Congress.

All of this creates an environment of discontent that further lulls people into submission, believing there is nothing they can do but comply.  But, the only reasons for such attitudes of discontentment are those very people are neither counting their blessings nor using what they have to create what they desire.  They either never knew the law or forgot how to use it to control our government—thus, they fail to act only because they don’t know what to do.

At the top of this article we quoted Ralph Waldo Emerson: “The fate of the poor shepherd, who, blinded and lost in the snow-storm, perishes in a drift within a few feet of his cottage door, is an emblem of the state of man. On the brink of the waters of life and truth, we are miserably dying.

Once people discover the true nature of the SSCT, they often feel a lot like that poor shepherd blinded and lost in the storm.  Like the shepherd only their ignorance keeps them from knowing how near they are to the door to freedom.  They feel like giving up and letting the storm take them; but, if they simply use the resources available to them, they will discover that they are on the brink of the waters of life and truth.

The choice is always ours.
The law provides simple enough remedies to save our children, ourselves and our nation; we merely have to learn the law to apply the remedy; that is what Team Law is all about.

Because, “All things are possible to those that believe”,  wouldn’t each of us be better off if we simply decided to start learning about the possibilities.  Instead of wasting the power within us by thinking thoughts of futures we don’t desire?  Wouldn’t we be better off learning how to, and freeing, our children ourselves and our nation in the process?  Just start now; and, imagine a future you desire.

Earlier in this article, we asked: “What would you do if you discovered someone was systematically lulling you into a false sense of security while they took your children away?”

After learning the truth, would you want to learn how to save them?
Would you do whatever you needed to do to save them?
Would you be willing to support others as they also worked to not only free their children but help insure that such a thing would never happen again?

Our answers to those questions are the very reason we started Team Law.

Contact us Team Law can help.


Use the following link to learn how to: contact us; or,
to stay updated with Team Law, click this link:
You’ll find a lot more information!

P.S. – FYI: The red, white and blue Team Law logo at the top of the page, both on this site and our Open Forum, will toggle the page between Team Law’s home page and our Open Forum.

top )

All information on this site is provided for educational purposes only, with all rights reserved. 
Use it at your own risk.  Team Law never provides legal, financial or any other form of advice.
All materials on or available through this site are under Copyright © 1996-2013, and may not be reproduced,
except as noted, without the written consent of Team Law’s Trustee.